Like the tagline says: There’s been a rather shocking murder at Deepdean School For Girls… Hazel Wong, a third form student, found the dead body of the science mistress in the gym. But by the time she comes back with her friend Daisy and a prefect, the body has disappeared. So the girls have to solve the murder, but they also need to prove that a murder happened in the first place. Daisy is excited at the idea of having their very own murder to investigate, but Hazel more realistically wonders what will happen if the murderer decides that they’re getting too close to the truth.
Ren: Set in an English boarding school in 1934, Murder Most Unladylike is a bloody good read. From the first page, it’s packed full of words and customs from that era, and I was completely immersed in Hazel and Daisy’s world. I loved that the author sounded very authentic, and the characters were always rooted in their time, without inexplicably displaying modern sensibilities. Plus, they have bunbreaks. I love that. Bunbreaks. In which they eat squashed flies.
Isa: I might have had a minor breakdown when they first mentioned bunbreaks. BUNBREAKS. How cool is that? Personally, I wouldn’t eat the squashed flies (ew, raisins), but I would very much welcome any and all bunbreaks thrown at me. Aside from the bunbreaks, I really loved the characters. They were a healthy mix of imperfect people and I really loved that. Too often characters in books are too perfect or too stereotypical or even just mere caricatures of a few traits thrown in a pot, but not so with Murder Most Unladylike. Daisy (why do I always want to call her Diana?) is headstrong and opinionated to a fault, but she also has a heart of gold when it counts and truly cares about Hazel, who has a bit of a pash on Daisy.
Ren: A pash, for the uninitiated, is a kind of girl crush. All the weird old-timey words are explained in the book, and there’s also a glossary at the end. I had the kindle edition so there was no way for me to scroll back and forth easily, but I assume if you had the dead tree edition you could refer to that if you got confused. Which you shouldn’t, since our narrator Hazel does a great job of explaining it all. I have a bit of a pash on Hazel, who gives us a unique perspective on English boarding schools since she’s from Hong Kong and has been sent overseas to get a perfect English education. Being an outsider, it makes sense that she would question the very English tradition of hitting each others with sticks — sorry, I meant playing hockey — under the rain… She’s torn between being herself and wanting to fit in, which is very relatable.
Isa: Yeahhhhhh… I don’t so much have a pash on Hazel but a full-blown crush. What a cutie! If only she weren’t jailbait, I could smooch her cute face and initiate her into the Order of Canoodling Ladies. Of which there are a bunch, by the way. My cold little heart and I were most pleased by the subtle (or blatantly in-your-face) references to canoodling ladies, hehehehe. And that’s another thumbs up to the author! I found it very refreshing that such things were included because, dude, those things do occur at all-girl schools and they did occur in the past and they way the author treated it was neither gimmicky nor swept under the rug. That, too, was very relatable, at least for me. And if I’m quite honest, it was the thing that excited me the most. (I’m pretty sure I yelled “LESBIANS!” at Ren when I first realised it.)
Ren: (You did. I’m pretty sure my reaction was “BUNBREAKS!” because they’re higher in my priorities. But yeah, I liked the non-gimmicky inclusion of lesbians and I was sad for the Maths Mistress who was obviously in love with the victim.) As for the murder itself, I have to say that I’m like Daisy: I absolutely love mysteries! I grew up with my mum’s Agatha Christie novels, so I really appreciated all the references to the popular mystery books that Daisy was reading and hiding from Matron. This particular mystery was rather easy to figure out for me, I guessed the killer very early on because of the way the author kept trying to divert the reader’s attention to the other suspects, but even so I was charmed by the characters and the setting and I enjoyed reading about how Daisy and Hazel solved the murder. It’s a proper English mystery crime, too, with enough clues that you may be able to figure it out if you like that sort of things.
Isa: I’m not that into mysteries, I’m afraid, mainly because I’m just not as invested. I like reading about the solving of a mystery, but unlike other people I take no joy from figuring out the culprit myself. Though I might make a somewhat satisfactory Watson to Ren’s Holmes, I suppose. I’d be pretty good at the whole writing down important things that you tell me, I bet. Anyhow, despite my general indifference to mysteries I did enjoy this one! I may not be into the solving but it was a compelling mystery and for somebody who didn’t guess the culprit it was quite fascinating to see Daisy and Hazel figure it all out. The author did a great job with that, it really felt as if I was by their side all the time and sharing the experience with them!
Ren: Isa would be an excellent Watson, though I’d be a rubbish Holmes because I’m a wimp and I wouldn’t want to run around chasing murderers. I’m quite happy sitting back and reading about Daisy and Hazel’s adventures instead of being by their side. The girls are really interesting characters and I’m looking forward to how they will evolve, since it seems this will turn into a series. Book two is set at a house party in the country, and while I’ll miss the school setting it will be fun to see Daisy’s family.
Isa: I’ll miss that too, but then I am sure we’ll see some familiar faces, like King Henry! And we might get to meet Daisy’s mysterious uncle! (Fingers crossed that he turns out to be the dashing Uncle Felix who is mentioned in the summary for book two.) All in all I’m terribly chuffed about the first book and I think it totally deserves the four teacups we’re giving it. The writing is compelling and never fails to deliver, and the setting and characters are particularly fabulous. If only there were happy homosexuals (alas, they never are in fiction) and more detailed descriptions about bunbreaks, I’d be willing to give it five. ;)